The Sustainability of Secondhand Clothing: A Science-Backed Solution to Fashion’s Environmental Crisis

The Sustainability of Secondhand Clothing: A Science-Backed Solution to Fashion’s Environmental Crisis

In the era of fast fashion, where clothing production has nearly doubled since 2000 and the average consumer purchases 60% more garments than 15 years ago but keeps them for half as long, the environmental toll is alarming. Secondhand clothing has emerged as a sustainable alternative, with mounting scientific evidence showing it significantly reduces environmental impact. This article explores how buying used clothing is not just a fashionable trend but a scientifically substantiated means of addressing the fashion industry's environmental footprint.

The Environmental Impact of the Fashion Industry

The fashion industry is responsible for a substantial share of global environmental degradation. According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), it accounts for approximately 10% of global carbon emissions and 20% of global wastewater—more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined. Furthermore, textile production requires immense resource inputs:

  • Water use: A single cotton T-shirt can require 2,700 liters of water to produce, the equivalent of a person’s drinking water for 2.5 years.

  • Carbon emissions: One kilogram of fabric can emit between 15–30 kg of CO₂, depending on the textile used.

(Source: UN Environment, Ellen MacArthur Foundation)

How Secondhand Clothing Reduces Environmental Harm

Secondhand shopping curtails these impacts by extending the life cycle of garments, thereby reducing the need for new production. A comprehensive 2016 study published in the Journal of Cleaner Production by Sandin et al. analyzed environmental benefits of textile reuse and recycling. The study found that reuse of clothing saves 60–85% of the water, energy, and emissions compared to producing new garments.

Furthermore, a 2021 life cycle assessment (LCA) published in Resources, Conservation and Recycling examined secondhand clothing use in Europe. The authors concluded that reusing one kilogram of textiles saves 3.6 kg of CO₂-equivalent emissions compared to new clothing production.

Waste Reduction and Landfill Diversion

Globally, 92 million tons of textile waste are generated annually, and most of it ends up in landfills or incinerators. According to the EPA, in the U.S. alone, 85% of used clothes are discarded, and only about 15% are recycled or reused.

Secondhand consumption helps reverse this pattern. A 2022 ThredUp Resale Report (using data validated by Green Story Inc., an environmental research firm) found that buying one item used instead of new displaces 19.4 pounds of CO₂ emissions, 1,800 gallons of water, and 82 kWh of energy. These figures are aligned with independent peer-reviewed LCA findings.

Behavioral and Economic Drivers

Scientific literature also shows consumer behavior is shifting. A 2020 study in Sustainability explored motivations for secondhand shopping and found that environmental consciousness and price sensitivity were leading factors. Importantly, this behavioral shift aligns with sustainability goals without requiring systemic industry reform—secondhand shopping is an accessible and immediate action for individuals.

Additionally, platforms like Poshmark, Depop, and ThredUp are democratizing resale access, while physical thrift stores and curated secondhand boutiques are growing in popularity among Gen Z and Millennials, demographics that are shown to have stronger eco-aligned consumer preferences (Niinimäki et al., 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment).

Conclusion: Scientific Consensus and Consumer Power

The evidence is clear and compelling: secondhand clothing dramatically reduces resource use, emissions, and waste compared to new clothing. Life cycle assessments and peer-reviewed research consistently demonstrate that reuse trumps recycling in environmental impact reduction, and secondhand shopping stands out as one of the most impactful and accessible changes individuals can make in their consumption habits.

As policymakers, brands, and consumers seek to create a more sustainable fashion future, embracing the circular economy through secondhand clothing is not just commendable—it’s essential.

Cited Studies & Sources

  1. Sandin, G., Peters, G.M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266

  2. Roos, S., Sandin, G., Zamani, B., Peters, G. (2016). Environmental assessment of Swedish fashion consumption. Mistra Future Fashion.

  3. EPA (2020). Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2018 Tables and Figures.

  4. Niinimäki, K. et al. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189–200.

  5. UN Environment Programme (UNEP). (2019). Putting the brakes on fast fashion.

  6. Laitala, K., Klepp, I.G., Henry, B. (2021). Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152, 104476.

  7. ThredUp Resale Report (2022), in collaboration with Green Story Inc.

Back to blog